Digital artist of photographer ?

Am i a photographer or a digital artist ?
This debate has been going on in my head for a while now and this is really getting on my nerves.
So i take photos, so im a photographer but if i add a bit of surreal and out of this world to a photo im a digital artist .Too confusing.
But why cant i be photographer if i photograph all the thing my self and i just composite them to give my photos a more out of this world look ?
On my opinion digital artists are the ones how create awesome digital drawings and photomanipulations not composits like i do.

What you guy's think ? am i wrong to consider my self as a photographer ?